Tag Archives: elitism

It’s Official: The OLIGARCHS are scums!

Reasons why you should not support them completely:

1.) They committed crimes against humanity – In other words, they have blood into their own hands.

2.) They’re the biggest tax evaders in the country.

3.) They exploit people by over-charging them, but gives them crappy services in return. In other words, the oligarchs are inconsiderate, insensitive, and lastly, INDIFFERENT! 

4.) They have no empathy—in short, they’re no different from PSYCHOPATHS and TERRORISTS.

5.) They breed like rabbits and exploit the people if the sovereign leader completely supports their vested interests.

6.) They do not intermarry as much as possible – Many of these oligarchs only marry their own kind: Aristocratic features, plus aristocratic background are two mandatory requirements. You must have both qualities. If one is lacking, then sorry you’re not fit.

7.) They are friends with the global elites who equally exploit their people by making their governments their puppets! In short, they think that they’re ABOVE the law.

8.) They kill people who are kind-hearted—inside and out, and also on-and-off-screen.

9.) They control every aspect of your life—not only the internet, but also the following: Electricity, taxes, gas rates, and the like.

10.) They could buy you, your friends, and the whole entire country—or even the whole entire world. In other words, they could pay assassins to kill journalists, or even whistleblowers like Julian Assange or Edward Snowden.

Why you should STOP worshipping and supporting the Yellow Oligarchs at all costs:

1.) They fund and support the terrorists. Plain and simple.

2.) They objectify women and LGBT alike.

3.) The Yellows are giving feminism and women empowerment a BAD NAME.

4.) The Yellow Oligarchs are motherfucking hypocrites to the core.

5.) They only enrich themselves, their party, and their cronies.

6.) Until now, Mary Jane Veloso’s case remains unsolved. However, Dalia Guerrero-Pastor and Fidel Sheldon Arcenas are still nowhere to be found. Only during the Yellow administration where the elites who believe they’re above the law are well-protected.

7.) They proclaim that they’re pro-USA, but honestly speaking, they support the global elites that control the USA and the entire world.

8.) They steal money from people to adorn themselves with heavy-studded jewellery. Take note ah, these jewels’s gems might be blood diamonds, or even rare gemstones that are obtained through killing thousands, or even MILLIONS of African people.

9.) They bribe and fund the CBCP.

10.) Don’t you know that the Yellow Oligarchs must be accountable for leaving the Philippines in oblivious poverty!? Also, don’t forget: Mas dumami ang mga OFWs nung kapanahunan ni Cory, and I believe it even doubled or tripled when PNoy came into power.

EDUCATE YOURSELF

The social elites, and the oligarchs in general, are descendants of mainly European colonizers who were on a mission to—no, not explore the world to obtain a historical record, but to explore the world to exploit people. Never forget, Christopher Columbus isn’t as kind than what you think. In fact, Columbus was a tyrant, someone who could be at-par with King Leopold II of Belgium.

Ask Sass Rogando Sasot. She scolded and sermoned Dr. Agnes Callamard for bringing her “Western liberalist” garbage in the Philippines, to “address Duterte his ‘alleged’ crimes against humanity.” No wonder, the EU has completely lost its credibility. It is alright that Digong rejected aid from the EU, since Filipinos have to be self-reliant. Come on. We all have the natural resources. Aid? No thank you.

Sass even ranted to Callamard, “YOUR ANCESTORS HAD BLOOD IN THEIR HANDS!”

No wonder, Tiglao said it right: “Our ruling class, on the other hand, have had a penchant for identifying themselves with our colonizers. They identify themselves with Spain (where many of them originated) and the US, and in recent decades, with China. For them, this nation is simply a market or a production site with cheap labor, not really their homes.”

Kaya mai-intindihan niyo rin si MSP kung bakit anti-elite siya tsaka anti-oligarch. And to these self-righteous know-it-all people out there, kung sa tingin niyo na “MSP is simply fighting at herself,” well, screw you! Madali lang sabihin iyan, but have you checked your privilege as well? Did you even ask, na privileged din kayo sa buhay? Heck, you could still be pro-masa, even though you aren’t street-smart. Heck, you could still be pro-masa, even though you own gadgets and eat in high-end restos. Heck, dumarating lang ang ka-plastikan kapag gusto mo ring mag-commute gamit ang jeep tsaka taxi, ta’s you claim that you’re pro-masa, eh mapang-mata ka pa naman. And you could still be pro-masa, while you discriminate according to your intuition.

Before idolizing the oligarchs, and the yellows alike, allow me to ask this: Do you think, we’re more compatible with the liberalism of the West, or the conservatism of the post-Soviet bloc? In fact, mas nakaka-relate pa nga tayo sa kultura ng mga post-Soviet bloc, eh. You might not know, yet many of us Filipinos could relate with the family-oriented and rather traditionalist culture of the post-Soviet bloc, bukod pa sa mga bansang Latinoamericano. Isali na rin ang Mongolia, where it’s the only East Asian country that is left untouched by Confucian influence—hence, its obvious gender-quality.

President Digong is doing his best to arrest these oligarchs for not paying their taxes. In other words, these pathetic groups of SCUMS are exploiting the people to satisfy their thirst for wealth. In other words, insatiable! These oligarchs can sue people who exposed their stench, or else, they would have ‘em killed. Ganyan ka-powerful ang mga untipunong sakim sa Pinas. All they struggle is power!

These people who admire the oligarchs are pathetic morons. In other words, they’d rather be slaves of their white masters. Oha, no wonder, white people are also discriminated and being treated like crap by locals in poorer countries because of their history as being “descendants of colonizers.”

The oligarchs at the same time are pro-terrorism! They pay assassins to kill journalists who expose their stench and their bad practices at the same time! Also, they have the temerity to have whistleblowers killed. Malamang, they could have hired dozens, or even a myriad of assassins to have Julian Assange or Edward Snowden killed. These whistleblowers could also be the ENEMIES of the Yellow horde. What if, they’re both Filipinos? Truth to be told, the yellows will be assassinated and killed, and at the same time, the oligarchs might be an endangered species, which is well, good news!

The case of BongBong Marcos: His anti-divorce reason might have a hidden meaning (which doesn’t seem secretive at all)

BongBong Marcos, no matter how much we like him, is still a member of a political dynasty, while his wife Liza Araneta-Marcos, is a member of an oligarchic clan (Araneta Center in Cubao City, obvious pa ba?). That kind of couple, malamang, is anti-divorce for many reasons, but there’s one reason that is clear to us all: Political dynasties who are married to members of oligarchic clans whose other side is against their in-law, might be the reason. Kwento nga sakin, the Aranetas who are more closely related to the Roxas’s are anti-Marcos, just so you know. Kaya huwag na kayong magtaka kung takot sa divorce law si BBM, ok? It shows that he’s not only a prude conservative who doesn’t open their minds when they study or live in other countries (ganyan kadalasan ang sakit ng mga Pilipinong konserprudista, eh—they justify that absence of divorce law: Strong family culture, which is not true at all), it also shows that people like him remain ignorant, despite having the means to travel or live abroad. Plain and simple.

Simply put, takot ang mga oligarchs tsaka mga political dynasties na mawala ang conjugal powers nila, once na may divorce law sa Pilipinas. No wonder, marami paring mga bulag na fans na kapwa konserprudista na nananatiling kalaban ng kalayaan.

The prude conservatives and the oligarchs are no different from one another

Both are arch-conservatives. They are intolerant, narrow-minded, and at the same time, self-righteous. They’re no different from the Yellows who pretend to be paragons of liberalism. However, they’re both a joke… and they are pro-Gina Lopez.

Ask Mr. Riyoh, if you want to know more about Gina Lopez, and reasons of Antonio Contreras’s rage against her.

Side Note: We are for Gina Lopez, but we were ready to accept her rejection. If you think the Commission on Appointments is wrong, then who backed her? Malamang, walang iba kundi ang mga Dilawan tsaka sina Sotto at Pacquiao.

Why do a lot of prudes support suppression of freedom, while they fear liberal ideas? Simply put, they have not yet freed themselves from their comfort zones. The decadent libertards and the prude conservatives alike are simply struggling for power, esp. when it comes to political correctness. That way, these groups of people at the same time, support the oligarchs and the political dynasties without questions asked. In short, they both use the name of God to justify their concept of “contentment.”

Also, the oligarchs are also known to promote a culture of “normalizing everyday decadence.” Many of these elites idolize and would patronize someone like Ellen Adarna, instead of Alodia Gosiengfiao. Also, they would rather patronize women who are infamous for being sexual objectifications, and at the same time, are notorious for their man-stealing, and being a third-party at the same time. Lastly, they would hire sexy dancers to satisfy their insatiable lust for sex. Never forget, the Liberal Party incident with the Playgirls. That’s how “normal” their type of decadence is.

Ginagawang parausan ang mga kababaihan, to the brink of promoting the yellow appointees as paragons and epitome of women empowerment. Also, take note ha, that the yellows and their counterparts discriminate, and also objectify the LGBT people.

At huwag na siguro kayo magtaka kung naging dekadente na ang isip tsaka kaluluwa ni Manny Pacquiao dahil ka-sosyo niya si Chavit Singson. Remember, the prude conservatives aren’t even morally erudite, either. They suppress freedoms of their children and their grandchildren, but at the same time abuse their freedom of authority to sermon their children not to do this and that. They also encourage their children to be masochistic martyrs, in order for them to “go to heaven” after they die.

Now, that’s where religion comes into place.

Religion could sometimes break someone’s conscience. Remember, science and God isn’t impossible to mix, but only to a certain amount. Now here comes the thing: Many Filipinos view mental illness as something to be taken lightly.

The prude conservatives view mental illness as “drama-drama lang iyan!” No wonder, the way they view autistic, schizophrenic, or even bipolar people are twisted. They make fun of ‘em. Also, they makes jokes out of ‘em. Kaya hindi nakapagtataka kung may mag-suicide pa sa campus, at dun na lang mag-raise ng awareness, tsaka acceptance. Kaya siyempre, ang pinaka-hate ng mga prudista na si Risa Hontiveros, nagsagawa ng batas na magkakaroon ng Mental Health Law para sa mga may issues diyan. As much as I do not like Risa, I would give props to her for that.

Kung sino pa nga ang nangangapa sa logic pagdating sa mga crucial issues, sila pa nga ang may malasakit sa mga marginalized tsaka thorny areas gaya na lang ng divorce, RH Law, tsaka mental health law. At isa pa, kung sino ang liberal elite tsaka leftist, sila pa ang mas may sensitivity sa mga minorities. Not that I’m being pro-leftist or pro-liberal—this is about who has more heart when it comes to issues like gender, or even well-being. The prude conservatives are obviously anti-divorce, dahil alam niyo na iyun. Also, only a few of ‘em are pro-RH is because well, religion. Lastly, kaya mababa ang tingin ng mga prudes sa may mental health issues is because, they believe sila ang “maghahasik ng lagim,” eh sila? Hindi rin ba sila naghahasik din ng lagim, gaya ng mga idolo nilang mga prudista?

Now I understand why there are some people who are anti-Marcos, bukod pa sa usual na “Martial Law was the enemy of freedom,” here’s the answer: The Marcoses are known to be prude people, lalo na si BBM. Also, may pinaghuhugutan din kung bakit ayaw ni Marlene Aguilar sa mga Marcos, partida Ilocana siya. Also, non-conservative Ilokanos tend to be anti-Marcos because of their reputation as prude conservatives, and I’m not even kidding. Usually, prude conservatives are known for giving a bad impression towards some people. 

Bukod pa sa mga Marcos, the Binays are also known to be prude people. Ironically for someone like Dr. Antonio Contreras, he’s not a conservative like what he said, but he voted for conservative leaders during elections, because he saw more potential in ‘em. That being said, the prude conservatives are only good in handling government offices, or even serving the people within their mandate. That being said, they’re kind of visionary instinct is greater than that of a liberal. Don’t believe? Then why are the likes of Putin, Nazarbayev, and Lukashenko are well-loved by their people? After all, not all conservative leaders are scums. In fact, they’re authoritarian visionaries who only want the best for the country and for the people.

However, still, conservative leaders are not-so nice to their staunch critics. That being said, many of them are either butthurt, or simply protecting the people. This makes me believe that libertardism won’t work in those places.

Kaya naman pala, ang mga konserbatibong mga senador lang din pala ang nagsagawa ng Cybercrime Law na iyan, at pinanigan pa sila ng Korte Suprema for that matter. Ibig sabihin lang nun, conservatives still want to boost their ego, and nothing else follows. Compared to the conservative power-trio, conservative Filipino politicians only care about their ego, and nothing else follows.

Conclusion: The prude conservatives and the oligarchs are anti-freedom of everything under the sun, both at the same time.

If you want to read more, CLICK HERE to find out more!

ONE-SIDED SHEEP – The case of Philippine Twitter cyberspace

putapete01Showing you is an example of a typical self-righteous elitist who has the traits of an elitist.

Apparently, if you take a look at Twitter, it is completely and staunchly one-sided like FemaleNetwork – GirlTalk forums, and of course, Fashion Pulis blog.

A lot of Twitter peeps believe that Miyako Izabel has more credibility than Sass Rogando Sasot. Wow, since when did someone who does not show 1 whole of her face and does not introduce much about herself become credible? At least, Sass shows her face, and gives a brief background about herself.

Elitists dominate Twitter

In fact, it is not actually conducive to be on Twitter anymore. Facebook is more useful in soooo many ways.

The Latest? #MochaUsonIsOverParty

Here’s what I said on my new page:

Proof na lungga ng mga halupagung jejolmang na DILAWTISTA ang Twitter:

1.) Many of these Twitter peeps defend the has-been bitch Anne Hathaway and justified her RUDENESS to Ricky Lo as “being herself.”

2.) Grabe ang pambu-BULLY nila kay Marlene Aguilar. Oh well, at least Marlene attacks them back by making jokes out of ’em. LOL!

3.) Grabe rin ang pambibira nila kay Antonio Contreras!

4.) They prefer Miyako Izabel over Sass Sasot. Oh wait, as much as I admire Miyako Izabel, her support for the yellows is something I won’t agree with.

5.) THE NERVE of them silencing Mocha Uson!? PATHETIC!

As a matter of fact, even Miyako Izabel condemned shutting down Mocha Uson’s page. Tingin niyo ba, gorabells lang si Izabel sa pagba-BAN ng mga pahinang pro-Duterte?

In fact, she has more EMPATHY than the elitists.

Kaya ang mga RED FLAG na pahina sa Pinoy cyberspace ay:

  • Twitter
  • Fashion Pulis
  • GirlTalk
  • Filipino Freethinkers Group

To these elitists who are anti-Marcos and Martial Law, here:

//platform.twitter.com/widgets.js

Kung ganun lang pala, dapat lang din i-BAN ang mga slogans kagaya ng “Marcos PUTA Duterte TUTA,” o ‘di kaya’y, “Marcos DICKtador,” “Pakyu MARCOS,” or “UKINAM MARCOS.”

IYUN NA!

Komikado Reacts: Antonio Contreras’s post, “POWERLESSNESS IN POWER”

I have admired the LEGENDARY professor of Political Science, Dr. Antonio P. Contreras.

YES, that’s him in the photo. He looks like this handsome-looking professor of International Studies. HAHA.

Komikado Reacts: Powerlessness in Power by Antonio P. Contreras

Many people would simply die coveting a post perceived to be loaded with power and privilege. The goal of landing in such a post has propelled many to suppress their natural selves and subordinate their being to the templates of the usual, acceptable and “normal.” This produces so much pretension and niceness, that one so mean could project a smiling face, and one so arrogant could suppress the smirk to kowtow to the wishes of the appointing gods. The autonomy that is vested in human subjects to chart for them their identities have to take a backseat if only to win approval, a mere brownie point when the name of the game is actually the big league, a seat in the front of the CEOs car reserved for bodyguards, a chance to carry the umbrella of the boss, or even the rare privilege of escorting the spouse while doing her shopping, or chaperone their bratty kids as they play in a theme park.

xxx

People have always said that it is lonely at the top. You may have all the money and the power, but both could not buy you true happiness, as the cliché goes. People are looking up to you perched in your office up there, but the sad part of it is that many of them are doing so not in admiration or awe but maliciously anticipating, or even betting, when you are going to fall, and how, and how fast, and how hard.

My being Dean for four years in my College taught me a lesson about being in power. While some would literally die, and beg, to get such a plum post, and while I am always thankful of the opportunity such post gave me to serve others, and the lessons I learned from such experience that contributed to my being a better person, I can categorically state, as I have said it on many occasions, that those four years were also the most disempowering years of my life.

I gained weight. This is what happens when physical activity yields to mental activity, and where endless meetings do not only produce stress that could cause hunger, but also provide opportunities to eat and eat and eat while seated to a point that the only muscle in the body that gets a hefty work-out is the mouth. Hectic schedules ruin gym plans, and mental stress drains so much energy that sleep and food become better alternatives than pumping weights or doing the treadmill.

And the list does not end there.

I also was forced to be more restricted in my fashion—the boring conventional type of long-sleeved shirts and trousers in black, blue and grey. My earrings had to go which caused my ear piercing to close. I could not have my tattoos, which I have had dreamed to have, lest I could be seen as improperly adorned. I was forced to behave according to protocol. Well, at least, most of the time. I could not just say things I wanted to say even if I was dying to. I literally forced myself to keep quiet and be poker-faced when under ordinary times I would have told off someone saying something stupid as that, stupid.

But the most stressful of it all was when I began to sense that a part of me was already acquiring the habitus, and the consciousness of a conservative administrator, when I began to dislike the behaviour of subordinates who were assertive of their rights, and were critical of some of my decisions, things which I would have done too had I been in their shoes. I was horrified when I realized I was turning into something I actually hated.

The irony is simply in being someone with a position of power and privilege, where you earn the badge of being called a “sir” and be treated like a little king, but you are in fact a slave of protocol, conventions and mission and vision statements you may not like but you have to live by. This has severe consequences on one’s identity. It was so palpable that when I stepped down as Dean, the very first thing I did was to go back to the gym and liberate myself from the fat I accumulated from endless eating while in stressful meetings. And I decided to wear my earrings again. And I finally got my tattoo, not only one, but two of them. And now, I am able to call a stupid idea for what it is—stupid—with the frankness that only a liberated, blue-blooded iconoclast like me could muster. I was so glad to feel the new sense of power that resulted from being out of power. I was back to my real me.

Recently, I was being considered for a government post. I thought maybe it is about time to again test the waters of being “disempowered” as a price to pay if only to serve our people. I was willing to again remove my earrings, and was training myself to wear long-sleeved shirts to hide my tattoos. I was ready again to gain some weight. In fact, I was already practicing becoming “nice” when I began to temper my commentaries in social media in preparation for the larger restraint I have to endure to gag myself, submit to the script of the establishment, and be silent even if it is about an idea I simply find stupid.

Fortunately, some people in the corridors of power were so helpful enough to prevent me from getting such appointment. I was told that I am not liked. Far from being depressed, I was so relieved. There is no word of gratefulness I could use to thank enough whoever that person was for saving me from the punishment of being once again in a cage just to be powerful.

What I think about Antonio Contreras is that, he does not pretend to be someone else. He is true to himself–he’s the bald guy who has ear piercings and peaceful tattoos that is unlikely to be worn by a professor, who is deemed as formal, strict in fashion, and of course, conservative.

NOPE. He ain’t your typical conservative, old-timer professor. He’s the guy version of Marlene Aguilar–fearless, bold, and thinks outside the box of tradition.

Una namin siyang nakilala bilang isang kolumnista sa GMA website. Siya nga iyung nagsulat ukol sa mga “Insecure Intellectual Elites,” bilang reaksyon niya sa mga all-knowing, self-righteous bashers ni Harvey Campos, isang estudyanteng nagtanong ng napaka-kontrobersyal na tanong sa yumaong pinuno ng Singapore na si Lee Kuan Yew. Siyempre, iniwasang sagutin ni Angkong LKY ang tanong, dahil kultura naman kasi ng Singapura ay, nananatiling pribado ang usapang pamilya.

Iyung mga “Insecured Intellectual Elites” na tinutukoy ni Antonio Contreras ay hindi lang iyung mga bashers ni Harvey Campos. Isama ko na rin iyung mga elitistang manunulat ng GetRealPhilippines.com, tsaka ‘yung mga shittakaburi netizens ng GirlTalk at saka ang grupo sa FB na, “Filipino Freethinkers [Updates and Announcements].” Hindi ko na rin palalampasin ang mga elitistang social climber na readers ng Fashion Pulis (FP-tards).

I don’t like the way the bashers judged heavily on Harvey Campos. Ihinahalintulad pa nila si Harvey kay Ricky Lo kung saan, stupid daw ang mga tanong nila, when in fact, they’re being bold and fearless at the same time.

I think these “ELITISTA” netizens are the ones who angered MSP, thus, when she writes anything about things related to the elitists, she would often bash them.

Here’s another criticism by megamabushii:

GT_prangkahan

Of course, the elitists will never understand when and how to use the concept of “cultural relativism.” Oh, sa mga apologists ni Anne Has-been-thaway ditey, her rudeness translated to her being a has-been. Walang nag-reply sa prangkahan ni megamabushii ay dahil, alam nilang guilty sila na dapat hindi lang sana nila hinusgahan si Ricky Lo.

Oh… marami talagang Kapamilya-twats sa GirlTalk, kaya puro kuda sila pagdating kay Ricky Lo, at ang kapal pa, huh! They started this thread, “Overrated Hosts,” and they glorify Winnie Monsod!

I respect Winnie Monsod but not anymore.

These GirlTalkers have such abominably poor and cheap taste! Most of them won’t vote for BBM but they’re YES to Leni.

Iba paring maging SHIT na MALAGKIT ang mga elitista, ano?

Makes sense?

It is a shame that many of these elitistas are not enlightened enough! They’re mostly scums who pretend to be pa-sosyal, when in fact, their manners remind me of people settling in the squatters’ area.

Damn!

The ruling class of the Philippines ISOLATE themselves rather than integrating with the common good

It’s sad but true–most of our Chinese and Spanish ruling elites do NOT integrate themselves in the Filipino culture–kesyo daw BADUY, jologs, o cheap, they will never understand the essence of being a Filipino if they continue to rule the country yet isolate themselves rather than integrating.

These elites do not only lack a sense of patriotism, they also lack a sense of environmentalism–granted, you do fucking business for fucking profit, but that doesn’t mean you have to exploit people per se. If you’re an oligarch, you have to have a sense of BOTH patriotism and environmentalism. Having NO sense of patriotism only means that you have an identity crisis yourself.

And so the fiasco begins…

The cocky know-it-alls (shittakaburi) and intellectual elitists do not know how it is to be an intellectual being. Male or female, they justify the crappy services of Globe (I think Smart Mobile is waaaaay better on Internet–it may be unfriendly towards people who text and call a lot, but it won’t fail you on Internet services) simply because telco companies do shit for profit, which is not right–after all, the customer knows best.

And please don’t get me started with the “lesser evil” shit, when it comes to politics. You will choose PNoy over Binay!? How stupid.

Yeah, Binay is plastic in real life (he is effing conceited, actually), yet you cannot question his efforts to help the people–he has done a lot of things in the Philippines, even though he and his family are a bunch of scums. Tony-sensei (how I call Prof. Contreras) ended up being an apologist of Binay.

Well, I won’t mind Binay despite being pretentious and a prima donna in real life–thing is, he has to prove that he shouldn’t do credit-grabbing (seriously, credit-grabbing is effing sickening!!!). In some aspects, Binay is good–yet we seem to overlook it.

And please take note that Binay is a Cory appointee.

Being plastic simply because you’re a Dean is really–uhm, disheartening. Oh, and you have to be “conservative” like the rest of the people who are “Slaves of their Boxes.”

Being a Slave of the Box: NOT a Cool Thing–AT ALL

We wouldn’t identify Tony-sensei if he has no tattoos, no piercings, and if he does not shave his head. Of course, he’s the type of guy you would still like to introduce to your parents–even though he shaved his head and got tattoos on his body. Right?

I know some people who still go to church, who sport peaceful tattoos. Oh, so don’t tell me that Leviticus shit from the Bible–Manny Pacquiao himself has tattoos on his body, yet he has the nerve to become a pastor. Abnormal lang, diba?

Pac_asia01

HAHAHA… I think Fuckman did have the nerve to become a “Christian,” yet all thanks to Jasmine Curtis-Smith, she pinpointed his mistake–through the Leviticus verse prohibiting tattoos.

See? That is why the likes of Carlos Celdran and Marlene Aguilar expressed their anger towards Fuckman.

Unfortunately, Manny himself is a Slave of the Box. Buti pa nga ang mga kagaya ni Floyd Jr., eh–Floyd may have been a woman-beater and a scum all his life, yet he does know how to keep cool–have you ever watched the video of his dad being “pabida” to Erik Morales? Senyor Erik cannot say a thing or two, since Floyd Sr. was clogging him verbally. Right?

No wonder Floyd Jr. is often disgruntled on TV.

Thank goodness he still managed to support marginalized people.

Meanwhile, Manny does not have that. Having lots of money, after all, cannot buy intellectualism. You may argue with me that money can buy a lot of books, however, it’s always good to think outside the box of tradition. Manny thinks that hurting the marginalized sector will make him more superior simply because he has lots of money–well, simply put, Manny is still a low-class scum.

YES, he is a low-class scum for many reasons.

I would expect him to be open-minded, out-of-the-box thinker, and at the same time, liberal. How many times do I have to tell you that he visited the goddamn States of America all throughout his life, and yet, he still remained bigoted.

In the States, bigotry is a mortal sin!

Well, it’s not only Pacman who suffers from this kind of syndrome–even those Filipinos who became American citizens are still far from being open-minded, tolerant, out-of-the-box thinkers and most of all, liberal–I’m pertaining to the Generation-X Pinoy promdis who still think like a provincial local in the Philippines: Too religious, slave of the box, and lacks an equal amount of imagination within them.

Yeah, that’s Filipino culture 101 to you!

I think the Philippines should learn from Tony-sensei

We need more legit intellectuals like Antonio P. Contreras, Marlene Aguilar, and Carlos Celdran. They think outside the box, and they are the true sources of Pinoy pride–why is that many Filipinos aren’t proud of them?

To be honest, many people would rather idolize Kris Aquino, Vice Ganda, Boy Abunda, and a lot of showbiz people who are not worthy to become “Pinoy pride.” I won’t even spare Pacquiao, either!

So ano say niyo? Leave your comments in the comment section and please, no rude comments. Many thanks!

#EDSA30 is NOT worth celebrating!

edsa30fuck

Tawagin niyo po akong KILLJOY sa lagay na iyun, ngunit hindi ko po gugunitain ang EDSA Revolution ng 1986.

Anong demokrasya? Baka counterfeit lang iyan!

Hindi po bayani ni Ninoy Aquino. Pwede ba, sa mga pahina gaya ng Thinking Class of the Philippines, mas lamang pa nga sa inyo sa talino ang GetRealPhilippines.com ay dahil kahit Negatronic ang vibes nila, ADIK sila sa pagsasaliksik. Realistic po sila.

Delusyonado po ang mga kalaban o haters ng GRP.

EDSA @ 30: Isang SALOT na pagkakamali sa Inang Bayan

Instead, naging “Putang Inang Bayan” na po ang Pinas dahil todo ang pangga-gago ng mga elitista sa bansa. O diba? Ngayon, kung tingin nila na berdugo ang mga Marcoses, eh sila pa nga (Dilaw fantards) ang mas masahol pa sa hayop! (Fuckquiao tone)

Mayaman po at sosyal ang Pinas bago pa man dumating ang EDSA Revolution. Mas malawak pa nga mag-isip ang mga Pinoy bago pa tinanggal sa Civil Code ang diborsyo. Putang ina! Ang pangga-gago ng simbahan ay simula ng pag-unlad ng paurong ang inang bayan.

Ang mga mali ni Marcos: Ang Katotohanan

Cronyism at saka nepotism lang po ang mali ni Marcos. Bukod pa doon, masyado po siyang nagtitiwala, tsaka mapagbigay.

Eh iyung mga human rights violations nung panahon niya? Iyan ang pagdurusa ni Gaddafi, bago pa man ang pagtalsik niya sa pwesto sa Libya.

Ba’t ko ihahalintulad si Makoy kay Gaddafi?

Halos lahat ng pag-aari sa Libya, eh sagot na ng pamahalaan iyun. Ganun din nung rehimen ni Makoy.

Tapos ngayon, nagiging everywhere na ang krimen sa bansa ay dahil na rin sa elitismo ng bansa.

Mas marami pang human rights violations nung rehimen ng mga Dilaw

Ninoy? Hero!? Are you joking me crazy!?

Truth is, traydor po si Ninoy. Naka-lista na po siya sa mga miyembro ng Illuminati bilang isang freemason. Well, hindi talaga siya as in miyembro talaga–kumbaga, parang representative lang ng Illuminati sa Pinas. Oh, huwag niyong sabihing nagkakamali ako!

Ang talagang elitismo ay nagsimula nung panahon pa ni Christopher Columbus. Sabihin niyong “bayani” si Columbus, ngunit sa totoo lang, hindi po talaga siya naging bayani. Berdugo po siya.

Ngayon, kung igugunita lang natin ang EDSA Revolution, parang ginunita lang natin ang Columbus Day sa Estados Unidos!

TAMA!?

Finally, someone PWNED the elitistas of Filipino Freethinkers [Updates and Announcements]!

Loyalist_finalz

This girl is awesome! Hahahahahahahahahahahahahaha!

What does she have that not even the twatards of Filipino Freethinkers and GirlTalk have?

Critical and Logical Thinking Skills!

That is why I think that the elitistas of Filipino Freethinkers and GirlTalk should not have the right to use social media!

That’s all!

Divorce should be LEGAL in the Philippines

Kung sino man ang tututol sa’kin, mga puking ina niyo, hindi niyo dapat imudmod sa’kin ang personal niyong isyu. Pwede ba!?

Kaya takot na takot ang mga Solon sa pagiging legal ng divorce bill sa ‘Pinas ay dahil:

1.) Masisira daw ang pamilya
2.) Kung legal ito, a-abusuhin ng mga Pilipino ito
3.) Most Solons base their arguments on divorce rates and matters in the USA alone
4.) They say, “I love my wife.” (Uhh… isipin niyo muna kaya mga kapatid niyong may marital woes)
5.) Sabi daw ng CBCP mapupunta daw tayo sa impiyerno
6.) Mawawala daw ang sanctity of marriage kapag maging legal ang diborsyo

LOL!

What a pathetic, lame and defeatist excuse, indeed!

As per someone, “Happiness is success.” Well, dito sa Pinas, they value homogeneity, image preservation due to social pressures and of course, traditionalism based on the Catholic faith–and they base most of their belief arguments from the VATICAN, not from the Bible itself.

Well, hindi lang din naman mga elitistang Solon ang ayaw sa diborsyo. Actually, pati rin ang mga elitistang conservatives na sanay na sa pagiging “normal” ng pangangaliwa’t pang-aagaw ng mga tao.

Philandering, cheating, womanizing, homewrecking and being a mistress is ADULTERY. ADULTERY wrecks the marriage itself. Even those who excel in theology know better than the conservatives who do not truly understand the Bible.

Umuunlad tayo ng pa-urong. Masakit pero totoo.

nakakahiya

Kaya hindi kayo dapat PROUD na ang Pilipinas lang ang bansang walang divorce, bukod pa sa Vatican.

Itigil na kasi natin ang pagiging sarado ang isip at ang pagkakahon ng ating kaisipan sa apat na sulok ng tradisyon. Tandaan, ang mga turo ng simbahan ay hindi naman para sa lahat iyan. Kung patuloy parin tayong tumutol sa diborsyo, tandaan niyo: Binabastos niyo ang sarili niyong dignidad, and I highly doubt that lack of divorce promotes strong marriages.

To be honest, if divorce is legal in the Philippines, it actually promotes strong marriage. KAYA kung magiging legal ang divorce, ganito ang mga provisions:

1.) Libre lang dapat ang annulment. Declaration of nullity? Please, it should be merged to the definition of annulment. Pwede ba, ang pagkakahon ng isip eh, outdated na!?

2.) Kung magiging legal ang diborsyo, it should be with reservations. Common sense naman, oh! Hindi dapat gawing “Vegas-style” ang diborsyo, kumbaga, dapat may certain provisions.

3.) We should promote the likes of Gordon, Belgica and Hagedorn. Also, give chance to Hontiveros and Pia Cayetano (I will always prefer Hontiveros over Nancy Binay, to think that the latter is more “maka-masa”–elitista man si Hontiveros, ngunit ang mga advocacies niya ay progresibo).

No wonder, MSP quit law school. In law school kasi, you are bound to think inside the box. Kung nakaka-inis maging weirdo, pwes, mas nakakainis parin ang pagkakahon ng pag-iisip. There’s something wrong with you if you don’t liberalize yourself and think outside the box of tradition.

Conclusion ko pala sa mga Solon: Masyadong tradionalistic ang mindset nila. I don’t see them as good Solons, I don’t know why they HATE to make divorce legal? Are they really bigoted? Do they really value their marriage as sacred? Or simply because they choose to turn a blind eye towards human dignity, all they care is traditionalism and image preservation?

To be honest, conservatism in the Philippines is outdated. As per Dakilang Mandirigma, “Kung nakakainis makarinig ng mga BAD WORDS, mas nakakainis paring makarinig ng mga sermon galing sa mga conservatives gaya niyo!”

Real Talk: Most (if not all) Filipinos are NOT YET ready to accept divorce, for now

To be realistic, for the fucking Nth time, Article II, Section 6 of the Constitution is violated–mostly by its own Solons. They allow CBCP to meddle with their affairs, esp. when it comes to divorce. No wonder, dito pumapasok ang Kaya Di Umuunlad Pilipinas syndrome.

And it’s not only the Solons who have an ego problem–it’s also the elitist men who think that their tyrant ways will make them more handsome.

Kaya pala tahimik ang gobyerno sa isyu ng mga garapal na demonyo gaya ni Sheldon Arcenas at Dalia Pastor–these two infidels are actually ELITES. However, the government chose to turn a blind eye towards these two is because, they know to themselves that they see Sheldon and Dalia when they look at themselves in the mirror.

Am I right!?

When will the Filipinos open up their minds and think outside the box of tradition? When will they accept divorce maturely? Truth to be told, Filipino society is still immature when it comes to saying YES to divorce, and then convincing the Solons to make it legal. Papano naman kasi, they only care about what society is dictating to them, while in fact, the elitistas are the ones who really impose social norms.

Kaya minsan, inisip ni MSP na mai-renounce ang kanyang Filipino citizenship upang mag-rebelde laban sas gobyerno ng Pilipinas.

Lastly, the infidelity teledramas that you see on TV? That is to normalize infidelity, preventing divorce to become legal.

This is even an uncomfortable topic in Filipino Freethinkers [Updates and Announcements]

Well, not only in FF–basta, any forum that is dominated by elitistas, your freedom of speech is in reality, suppressed. Elitistas will call you weird and will stare at you from head to toe because you think outside the box of tradition.

#RealTalk: Filipino Freethinkers is dominated by active members with the “otaku” mentality. Kung sa GirlTalk, maraming kababaihan ang mga elitista, dito sa FF naman, karamihan sa mga lalaki, mga elitista. Until now, they’re still misogynist, sexist and still objectify women. They fantasize women, esp. East Asians, and think that divorce is actually a threat.

I bet, they have no say on Sheldon Arcenas and Dalia Pastor is because, they see themselves being Sheldon or Dalia, only in a different version.

That is why I would like to react, “Democracy my ass!” Actually, Filipinos do not deserve any form of democracy at all, if they still continue to think inside the box of tradition.

I guess, the elitistas in Filipino Freethinkers, when they have girlfriends, they often tend to cheat, to philander and to womanize behind their girlfriends’ back. I don’t see them as good husbands, either. Like what I said, they have a high tendency to be like Sheldon Arcenas.

As per Kat Viola, “We should drag the Philippines into the 21st century, screaming and kicking!”

Thinking Class of the Philippines FB page: The epitome of a Shittakaburi (a Japanese term for know-it-all)

 

GRP is the real thinking class, albeit having elitista writers
The real thinking class can be found through most of the writers in GRP. Thinking Class only loves to do fault-finding (esp. the Marcoses), but they actually fail to discuss the dark side of the Yellow Oligarchs.

Real Talk: Thinking Class may be leftist or prolly a form of Yellow propaganda.

Eh hindi ko na nga pinatulan ang TANGINA THIS! dahil nga kumpirmadong leftist ang mga iyan. Leftist-rationalist, ika nga.

Yeah right, call me a Marcos apologist of some sort, however, Thinking Class is the real dumbass. Mas matatalino ang mga admins ng Showbiz Government (to think they’re whiners) pati mga writers ng GRP.

Baka mahilig maglagi ang mga elitista ng Filipino Freethinkers sa Thinking Class o TANGINA THIS page.

Or prolly the elitistas of FF are admins of the Thinking Class page.

Truth to be told, it should never be called the “Thinking Class” page. Dapat ang tawag diyan, “Nagpapaka-elitista” page or “Yellow Media Lovers” page. Anong thinking class ang meron diyan? And yet, they said walang nakapansin sa pagbisita ni Akie Abe sa Payatas?

Fuck! I think the admins of Thinking Class rely heavily on mass media! How ironic, the admins there manage a “Thinking Class” page, but their Critical and Logical Thinking skills are dubious.

Critical and Logical Thinking skills is something that cannot be fully-nourished by the elitistas. Elitistas are mostly self-righteous, cocky know-it-all people who may have exceptionally high IQ, but speaking of EQ, they fall down.

And I’ll tell you this: Chiz Escudero is a primary example of a cocky know-it-all and an intellectual elitist at the same time. No wonder, nasira pangalan ni Heart Evangelista dahil sa pagpapakasal sa kanya.

Alright–if Donald Trump is a primary example of being an elitist (seasoned, actual and of course, legit), then Chiz is almost becoming one. You see, these elitistas and shittakaburi (know-it-alls) get along together in one day, but on the next day the snub one another. That’s one primary example of using one another!

If the shittakaburi are crap, then the intellectual elitistas are much worse! Therefore, Thinking Class page is a cocky know-it-all, kissing the asses of the elitistas!

Buti pa nga ang GetRealPhilippines, marami pa tayong natutunan sa kanila. Call them somewhat elitista (granted, many of them are elitistas since they bashed Harvey Campos for bringing the Filipino obsession on Showbiz towards Singaporean strongman LKY), however, in other aspects I admire them.

Side Note: The elitistas are using cultural relativism in a wrong manner. If someone is a white celebrity, they will bash the interviewer if there’s awkawrdness, esp. if he/she’s Filipino or any other Asian, but when an American interviewer brings sarcastic jokes to an interviewee and the latter reacted negatively, the latter is being bashed. Puh-leeze! If bragging is bragging, then worse, being rude is still rude. The elitistas of GirlTalkers bashed Cara Delevingne for being “rude” to the Good Day Sacramento interviewers, but these interviewers for me ridiculed Cara. While on the Ricky Lo hulabaloo? Don’t gemme started with that! These elitistas in GirlTalk (and FP-tards–FP-tards not spared! FP himself is an elitist trying to twist values) applauded Anne Hateaway for her rudeness. Buti nga kay Anne Hathaway, she’s a has-been. I never congratulated her when she’s going to have her first child, like what I did to KubetAA (I actually congratulated Marian Rivera and Miho Kanno instead–at least they deserve to become mothers). The elitistas may call me a “moralist” in some way, however, these elitistas have twisted values.

Teaching them to be rude because they’re half-white? Or because they have white skin and somewhat East Asian features? As a matter of fact, these elitistas are rude because they’re blessed with aristocratic features, yet speaking of their manners, I think the whites dislike them. It’s not because of their looks–the whites actually despise elitism. They easily get tired of the elitism the media shoves upon them. Also, the whites do not look up to these elitistas is because, they think that those with native looks are less ma-ere. Mother Dragoness attested that ni-Vanuatu people are free from elitism–meaning to say that their lives are simple.

No wonder, Mother D looks down on Paris Hilton, Victoria Beckham and Kim Kardashian–but the worst would be Jocelyn Wildenstein. For Mother D, being a socialite is “vomit-worthy.” Totoo nga naman. The term “socialite” is referring to an elitista who thinks about nothing but luxury. Thing is, Kim K, Paris and Posh do not fall under that category.

Speaking of the shittakaburi, they define the worth of a person based on the number of friends they have. Quantity for them matters–so meaning to say, statistics is more important than quality control.

However, quality control is more vital compared to statistics. It’s simply preferring morals over obedience is because, obedience is similar to being a sheep for life–obedience is making one gullible to the requests of unworthy entities surrounding him. Morals, however, are things that support your lifetime principles. So “moralism” here will be used in a critical manner.

The elitistas will twist morals by using cultural relativism in a wrong manner. Proof? I gave you examples. Worse, they will portray Cory Aquino as a saint, while in fact the Roman Catholic Church hasn’t confirmed any Cory-based miracle just yet.

And yet, they use the RCC to oppose divorce and insist on annulment still staying expensive and the 5-years effective period. Some of them are closet hypocritical Satanists. Oh, I guess they deny the existence of the Illuminati since they think that pure scientific basis is GOD.

They don’t have a sense of humanity. They don’t have a sense of patriotism, environmentalism and the worst would be the fact that they do not have a sense of moral values. Mother D is right: The elitists are scums.

So please, if you spot a shittakaburi, better be careful and distance yourself. They’re the most toxic people you’ll ever meet–aside from the elitistas. The shittakaburi and elitistas are known for their… elitism. Don’t forget their so-called superiority complex–esp. the élite Chinese community who seem to be wealthy, yet belong to the fuerdai. Many elitistas in FF and GT are prolly belonging to the noveau riche class of the fuerdai–who are worse than social climbers. After all, the term “fuerdai” is pertained to the young generation who have the money and luxury good, but lack class and breeding.

Yet these fuerdai-like elitistas bash Jeane Napoles. Yeah, Jeane may have burned our taxes, but that doesn’t mean she should answer to all these money matters. She was blinded by Janet Lim-Napoles–but the elitistas? They’re not blinded figuratively, or raised to be spoiled brats. However, their attitudes make them elitistas that they are now–worse than the shittakaburi.

The elitistas are like the shittakaburi–only much worse. Imagine living with them. It’s simply like living in hell.