Category Archives: Confession Box

Dear regressive right and left: You DO owe your successes to a corrupted system

In a system so corrupt, you didn’t even question the way it was managed by the oligarchy, and of course, the crocopigs feeding their ego.

You owe your successes to the corrupt system that nourished your careers so much, you even thought that corruption is a “way of life,” rather than an anomaly.

No wonder, you prude conservatives and liberal elitists are BOTH regressive.

PRUDES: You approved of cyberlibel no thanks to Tito Sotto’s thin-skinned behavior. You are anti-divorce, anti-FDI, and lastly, you won’t mind Manny Pacquiao to be the “first Christian president” of the Philippines.

LIBERAL ELITISTS: You believe, democracy is dead. De Lima getting jailed. Strongman Marcos buried at the Libingan ng mga Bayani. Lastly, CJ Meilou Sereno being ousted by her own colleagues.

Guess what?

You are fucking disgusting to the core.

You really do OWE your current successful achievements in your own entire careers to the corrupt system that nourished you. That’s why, even your minds, hearts, and souls have accepted corruption towards your system, making you one of the contributors of “Kaya Di Umuunlad Pilipinas” syndrome.

Wait until you experienced the plight of the Jews and Armenians in world history. Having a sense of entitlement, being inconsiderate, and thinking you own democracy like your personal property should be grounds for you to deserve being a true victim of genocide.

No one needs your fucking rotten mindset, anyway.


Kung bobo ka, bobo ka talaga!

This is a RANT to those who think that it’s OK for kids to be stupid, by saying that the planet next to Mercury is 7-11.

Call me killjoy of some sort, but this is unacceptable. Sure, this is funny to most of you, still the BBC commentary on North Korea when the two kids entered the dad’s room is much more hilarious.

The reason why I am RANTING BALLISTICALLY is because, if you are allowing your kids to be BOBO AF, then they’ll be the jejemong hitad who works at “The Krusty Krab,” o “e di sa puso mo,” as a “freelance model” kuno.

Now, these people on social media would most likely to be BOBOTANTE: They vote for Tito Sotto and Manny Pacquiao in the senate because, “Malaki ang binigay niyang karangalan sa bayan,” or other ad hominem reasons such as, “Sikat, eh!” Voting for these two goons is no different from voting for either Sonny Trillanes or even Grace Poe. Trust me, you don’t want to see me angry, right?

Being “bobo” doesn’t always mean, “Walang alam,” o “puro bagsak.” Being bobo actually means, lacking imagination at the first place. Ang kabobohan, it’s a life decision. Kung pipiliin mo talaga maging bobo, magiging bobo ka talaga. No wonder, you should no longer wonder why I consider G Toengi, Marlene Aguilar, Cheska Garcia, Ina Raymundo, and Andi Manzano as the “matalino league,” while at the same time, I look down on the likes of Donita Rose, Sunshine Cruz, or even Gretchen Barretto.

Being matalino is also improving your race. Call me racist, elitist, and anything you want, but I can NO LONGER afford to be a hypocrite. Calling Melai Cantiveros “attractive” as a monocultural Asian person IS a sign of hypocrisy. However, calling Song Hye-kyo, Kristine Hermosa, Marian Rivera, Heart Evangelista, or even Ellen Adarna “attractive” as a monocultural Asian person IS a sign of honesty.

Also, calling Natalia Poklonskaya, Sabina Altynbekova, and Katya Lischina attractive as the same person I have mentioned, IS considered a sign of honesty. Who won’t ever follow them on social media, right?

Lastly, if you’re going to call Yui Aragaki the “ideal girl” of the town, again, as the same person I’ve mentioned, IS a sign of honesty.

Being honest (without sugarcoating), having high standards, rich and expensive taste, and settling for MORE (or not settling AT ALL), IS a sign of intelligence. That’s why, be frank with accord to your standards. Kung prangka ka ng prangka’t si Marlou Arizala o si Manny Pacquiao naman ang mga idolo mo, will you still be tagged as credible? I don’t think so, esp. if you think that it’s ok to be brutally frank, even though your standards are painstakingly low, and your taste is also poor and cheap. It’s also being brutally frank and being a prude conservative, esp. when it comes to relationships, but would often idolize boyfriend-stealing celebrities like Maja-rot Salvador and Cristine “KubetAA” Reyes-Khatibi.

Wala kang karapatang maging prangka kapag hindi siya naa-ayon sa standards mo. Also, wala ka ring karapatang maging prangka kung ultimong idolo mo pa lang, lumalabag sa mga prinsipyo mo. Isn’t that a sign of hypocrisy, na it’s ok for boys to chase women, pero “cheap” kapag babae ang naghahabol, unless mang-aagaw siya ng dyowa?

In that case, Majarot and KubetAA needed a father figure like Tito Sotto. At least, hindi na sila mang-aagaw ng boyfriend kahit kailan, since they have a father figure who could already guide them how they should handle their relationships. Kung “misogynist” sa tingin niyo si Tito Sotto, well, at least someone has a good concern when it comes to raising their daughters. Tingnan niyo si Ciara Sotto, did you ever hear of her stealing boyfriends? Pwes, siya nga ang “inagawan,” kaya siguro bumalik siya sa poder ng mga magulang niya.

Also, enough of the “lumaki kasi ng walang tatay eh” excuse. Usually, those women who steal boyfriends are often fatherless, but it’s the mother’s responsibility to show a good example. No wonder, iyung nanay ni Selena Gomez na si Mandy Teefey, she deserves to be called “na-ano lang,” besides Miho Nishida. Iyung mga babaeng lumaki ng walang tatay ngunit pinalaki ng lolo o lola, sila pa ang walang problema sa pagkakaroon ng nobyo: It only means, those girls who grew up with their grandparents (usually those who have a heart, and are willing to raise them in behalf of their mothers) are often more well-behaved, and less likely to be stealing boyfriends.

Speaking of stealing boyfriends, it’s also a sign of KABOBOHAN. Also, kung papayag si boyfriend na agawin siya ni mang-aagaw, siya na talaga ang ulirang BOBO BOY, at si mang-aagaw ay certified GAGA GIRL (refer to DOH’s song on teen pregnancy). Facts don’t care about feelings, that’s why if you see a mang-aagaw girlfriend and “nagpa-agaw” boyfriend, they’re the ultimate INUTIL couple.

At ang mga BOBO pa naman, they breed like rabbits: They create a generation of MORONS who remain jejemon and have this “halupagu” mentality. They’re the same people who called Marlene Aguilar “baliw,” and at the same time glorifying Manny Pacquiao’s rather self-righteous yet contradictory statements. Lastly, sila dapat ang maging biktima ng genocide kung saan, sana sila na lang ang pinatay, imbis na iyung mga totoong biktima ng genocide pa ang pinatay.

No wonder, we need to stop this epidemic called, “KABOBOHAN.”

NOTE: This is a collab blog entry with MSPanythinginrandom.

Do boyfriend-stealing female celebrities need to have a reputedly “misogynist” father figure?

Heto lang naisip ko: Papano kung si Majarot tsaka si KubetAA eh naging ama si Tito Sotto?

Para sa amin, hindi na sila mang-aagaw kahit kailan ng dyowa. Remember, if you have a father figure in life, you’ll be compelled NOT to steal boyfriends.

Idolizing Majarot and KubetAA, while feeling sorry for what Pepsi Paloma has gone through is NOT an argument. Ayaw din namin kay Tito Sotto bilang mambabatas, ngunit isipin niyo nga ‘to: Si Ciara Sotto, nananatiling mabuting halimbawa sa mga madla kahit mabigat ang pinagdadaanan niya bilang madre de pamilya. It shows, Tito Sotto isn’t all that bad—he’s simply put: not a good solon, which bobotante people will never understand (take note ah, Tito only entered politics because of PURE nepotism).

Remember when he “shamed” a woman who displays her decadent lifestyle? Never forget the outrage of people, calling Tito a “misogynist.”

Well, fatherless women who steal boyfriends need to have a father figure like Tito Sotto. Isipin niyo kaya ‘to: Kung misogynist talaga si Tito Sotto, how come matatag parin ang kanyang relasyon sa asawa niyang si Helen Gamboa?

Side Note: And speaking of his statements towards Judy Taguiwalo, he should check his privilege!

To quote QueenRoxy:

Those who defended Tito Sotto clarified na parang tatay lang din na nanenermon iyan. They even added that the woman was also trying to save her ass kahit siya rin mismo ang may kasalanan why their marriage has been screwed up. Sometimes we need to give our fathers, husbands and boyfriends the credit why they are being uptight on us. Iisa lang din ang likaw ng bituka ng mga lalaki and alam ng lalaki ang animal instinct ng kapwa lalaki.

This is what I mean—MSP suggested the question of, “What if, si Majarot at KubetAA, si Tito Sotto ang naging father figure nila? It only means, hindi nila siguro afford mang-agaw ng dyowa.”

To be honest, I will agree. Minsan, nagiging “excuse” na ang hindi pagkakaroon ng “ina-ama” sa buhay para lang mang-agaw ng dyowa. Tingnan niyo kaya si Julia Montes? Pia Wurtzbach? I never ever heard of them stealing boyfriends, to think they were too distant from their fathers. Speaking of Majarot and KubetAA, I don’t think their being fatherless was an excuse for them to steal boyfriends—after all, if you idolize both of them, you don’t have the right to hate on Kris Aquino: Kris TOO LOW is another example of someone who not simply steals boyfriends—she’s a legit homewrecker for eff’s sake.

Also, stealing boyfriends isn’t only offensive to the original girlfriend, but also to men who also keep their pride intact. Kaya hinihiwalayan talaga ang mga mang-aagaw—look at Dennis Trillo, he may have been a jerk before, but he’s smart enough to deny that he and AA Klenk were together. Dennis Trillo may not be a good boyfriend, but he sees marriage as a lifetime COMMITMENT. It’s not because, marriage = lust. Mali iyun. If you want to be taken seriously, to quote Charlize Theron, she “treats her relationships like marriages.” No wonder, even though she is equally-flawed like the rest of the celebrities, at least she’s transparent and not pretending to be “untouchable.”

Mas hanga pa nga kami sa mga artistang ina-aming tao din sila’t, hindi dekadente ang pamumuhay nila.

Kaya naisip ko ‘to ay dahil, you see, if Majarot and KubetAA will have a father figure like Tito Sotto, at least nagagabayan sila kung papano mag-pursue in a relationship. Also, at least, if they have boyfriends, malamang they have a cue on how to make sure, the guy is single and available for dating.

Ang pang-aagaw kasi ng dyowa, you’re not only insulting the original girlfriend; maski sarili mo na rin (bilang babae) tsaka iyung lalaki ang binabastos mo. Usually, ang lalake ang papayag kung magpapa-agaw siya sa mang-aagaw (realtalk iyan! Itanong niyo lang sina Gegemon tsaka bRayver).

In fact, if you are a woman and you tolerate mang-aagaw female celebrities, and idolizing them while turning a blind eye to their decadentscapades, then fuck you! Also, sa mga lalakwe, look up to Majarot and KubetAA, then you’re becoming a Michael Sonmore. Sums up, MSP and I actually hate Selena Gomez because she’s becoming like the two mang-aagaw artista—idolize Selena, and you’re actually screwing up your relationship. In fact, Selena is Michael Sonmore in female form: If Sonmore allows his wife to f*ck other men in the name of “feminism,” Selena relies on friends’ exes, and makes them her “leftover” boyfriends, thus making herself a rebound. Ano iyun, kakain lang ng pagpag!? Huwag kami, oi!

Side Note: And take note ha, iyung sinabi ni Tito Sotto kay Ka Judy? He should tell it to Selena’s mom instead. I’m sure, mas making sense pa si Titosen. The way Selena was brought up sums up how she handles her relationships—the most credible source will be exposingSMG.

Remember, we’re not even moralist to say these things. Kung ayaw namin kay Titosen bilang mambabatas, pagdating naman siguro sa pagiging padre de pamilya, mas hahangaan pa namin siya, kahit papano. After all, speaking of the “urban legend” that is about the “rape” thing is actually fake. Kung totoo talagang nangyari iyun, malamang hinatulan sila kaagad ng parusang kamatayan.


Special Request (daw, oh! LOL) from someone: #KomiSays about Yui Aragaki and Namie Amuro!

I myself and me, plus you know my number one online BFF IZ back in collaborating!

Yui Aragaki modified with “Sept. 20” tattoos.

Now what can I say about Yui Aragaki and Namie Amuro?

1.) They’re both Okinawans with good bone structureKung hindi naman makorte ang wangkata nila (seriously, they lack the plumpness of boobs and butt), eh bawing-bawi naman sa bone structure nila. Ryukyuans are pretty known for their good bone structure, at sila lang ‘ata sa Japan ang matino-tino ang bone structure.

Credits to for this pic! Kamukha ni Namie-san si Rosa Kato ritey!

Credits to jdramaconfessions (Tumblr).

2.) They still remain wholesome inspite of their body modifications – Yui Aragaki has three piercings on her left ear, and same with Amuro Namie… but what’s in Namie that ‘Gaki does not even have? Tattoos. Sadly (but for yours truly, gladly! LOL), Namie-sama had her tattoos erased. For most Namie fans, they’re sad over the loss of her tattoos, but for me… it’s a good relief.

Photo credits from Twitter (BotGakky), and amuro(dot)fr.

3.) They have beautiful faces PEOPLE MUST REALLY ENVY! – The envy part is Choz lang. Yet, Namie and Yui have PERFECT features in my book, that’s why you’d rather have them instead on television, plus the tattoos, rather than plasticized telebasura celebrities with plastic personalities. At least, pretty vampire-like faces with tattoos on their bodies make them look interesting than those plastic-fantastic celebrities that make your eyes hurt from time-to-time, everytime you browse thy Instagram.

4.) If Yui Aragaki will have Namie Amuro’s tattoos, she will really look AWESOME! – ESP. those arm tattoos! Not only Gakky will look bad-ass, talagang mas maaliwalas pa sa paningin ng mga tao ang pretty innocent face na nga, may tattoo pa sa braso!

Also, what’s interesting about Namie’s tattoos is that, they’re fashionable (besided meaningful). I may have hated Namie’s tattoos, but to be honest, that’s because it wasn’t nicely done! And the placement really just sucked… at least for me.

5.) If Namie Amuro is as TALL as ‘Gaki, definitely she would look more interesting (albeit pretty off) – In fact, Namie-san said, if she weren’t a singer, she would be a flight attendant instead. Imagine her being a flight attendant? That way, no tattoos, and she speaks English well, if ever. Could you yourself imagine a Namie Amuro like that?

6.) They’re not only good-looking, they’re also TALENTED!

Credits to jdramaconfessions (tumblr). Apparently, Gakky is said to be “just looks, but weak talent.”

Testimonials regarding Gakky: Apparenty, Yui Aragaki stays in the game despite being branded as a “weak actress,” and a “meh singer,” by most people (well, Sandara Park was once branded as “talentless,” and prudes will join the bandwagon by saying, “How did she even win Star Circle Quest at the first place?”), yet how come she remains in the industry? Simple: Her personality. Gakky is definitely you want to introduce to your parents, and of course, to your friends or relatives. That “something” in Gakky is something that NOT even AA Klenk (go search on my blog who she is, go!) will ever have! Glad thing, Gakky has improved her acting—and the audience will never question the fact that she does her part well, everyone’s convinced about her presence. The bad side is, Gakky is said to be overshadowed by her co-stars—don’t forget Legal High, when of course, Le Masato Sakai thru his role as Kensuke Komikado (hahaha, that’s yours truly but he’s a different person) is the STAR, rather than Gakky’s role as the naïve, and rather clueless Machiko Mayuzumi!

Credits to jdramaconfessions (Tumblr).

Yui Aragaki is also known for being effortlessly cute, without the effort. This is something that the Philippine Entertainment Industry should consider—a wholesome actress with this factor is the most child-friendly! When you say Yui Aragaki, what pops from your mind is WHOLESOMENESS! Kaya kahit pasuotin mo ng bikini si Gakky, hindi mukhang bastusin. That’s something that Ellen Adarna should get a thing or two.

Testimonials regarding Namie: Namie may have a robotic voice (well, Ayumi Hamasaki and Kumi Koda’s voices are much more commendable), yet she IS the hitmaker! If Ayu-chan (Hamasaki) is the fashion trendsetter, Amuro-sama is the BOMB when it comes to iconic costumes that are unforgettable.

Also, Namie dances, which is something I yet to expect to other popstars. Despite her tattoos (which are finally erased, at last!), she remains shy and reserved—even during her partying days, no one even knew those things! She only shows bad-assery when it comes to performing not only in her MVs, but also during concerts. According to a PhilStar article (btw the author went to Taiwan just to have a glimpse of her performance), Namie does not do spiels at all (well, she does have a free pass NOT to do spiels, since she’s NAMIE AMURO!!!).


Both are shy and reserved (ok never be fooled by their body mods), but still, they show a good impact in their native Japan! This is what most young and neophyte artists should take note: LIVE THE LIFE LIKE NAMIE-SAMA AND GAKKY-SAMA!!!

NOTE: This is a collab entry with mspanythinginrandom.

Confession Box: Ilda Ignacio’s rant against the real FEMINAZIS

Someone’s rant against women-shamers, re: Ilda’s rant against Mocha’s bashers:

Kaya kahit anong sabihin ninyo, bukod pa kay Maria Ozawa tsaka Pamela Anderson, mataas rin ang paggalang ko kay Mocha Uson.

I am simply wondering why a lot of people who call for gender equality (and advocating the embodiment of such) would gush for someone like Kris Aquino, Maja Salvador, and Cristine Reyes. Hindi ko na rin isasanto sila Leila De Lima, Leni Robredo, tsaka Risa Hontiveros, because if you advocate feminism or the like, but you tend to idolize people who have a track record of stealing boyfriends, husbands, to the brink of homewrecking, while at the same time strongly accuse Marian Rivera or Angelina Jolie for stealing boyfriends or husbands—isang malaking PHACK EWE sa inyong lahat.

Diba, napaka-hypocritical? Feminist tsaka gender equality advocate, pero ang ini-idolo, mga tunay na haliparot sa lipunan? In fact, the same people who practice that hypocritical decadence call Marlene Aguilar “baliw,” or even “Sisa.”

The one who posted the rant even said, prude conservatives and leftists are equally hypocritical: They may advocate feminism, gender equality, and women empowerment, yet IRONICALLY, they idolize women in the showbiz industry who are known for stealing boyfriends, and even wrecking homes.

At dagdag pa daw niya, ayaw niyang maisali si Leni Robredo, ngunit heto iyun: Calling Honeylet kabit, and calling Sass Rogando Sasot “pokpok” is another story. Una sa lahat, matagal nang annulled ang kasal nila Ka Digong tsaka Mama Beth. Si Sass? So kapag legal ang prostitution sa Netherlands, do you still think prostitution is still empowering? Of course not! However, the Netherlands is known for its tolerance, so just you know, accusing someone of “working as a prostitute in the Netherlands,” esp. kapag LGBT iyan, is an act of intolerance.

Kaya ang mga prudista, mga leptista, tsaka mga Dilawan, they’re no different from each other. This is the very embodiment of a dysfunctional Philippines, said the one who said the rant.

So, before you judge Sass Rogando Sasot for filing suit against Jover Laurio, hindi ba nakaka-banas iyung tatawagin kang “pokpok,” and deadnaming a trans? Iyan na nga ang suliraning hinarap namin, as we even shamed someone who is obviously an immigrant visa holder, deadnaming a citizen of that country—ngayon si former, deported na.

Kaya ang mga ibang Pilipinong bobotante, sila pa ang dapat i-force feed ng lugaw, saba, tsaka tinapa (and please, don’t associate them with Leni, Leila, and Risa). They’re the ones who buys vehicles but do not follow traffic rules. They’re also the ones who shame the LGBT community, while they claim that they love God. Isn’t it against God to look down on the LGBT, simply because of their gender identity?

Back to topic. This is about shaming women.

Now speaking of feminism, it is already a joke. Feminism should be equalist, right? But because they’re becoming like, “WHITE POWER!”, that is to say, feminism now becomes more on “man-hating.”

That’s why if you really want to be respected, avoid idolizing women who are infamous for stealing boyfriends, or even husbands. That being said, papayag ka bang maging kabit? And I’m NOT going to spare the elitists on GirlTalk: They shame women who date their best friend’s ex-boyfriend, but aren’t they no different from those who claim that they don’t want to be a mistress, but does it anyway?

Yeah, wagas magpahiya ng mga babaeng naging dyowa ang ex ni BFF, ngunit sinasabi nila, ayaw nilang maging kabit pero ginagawa parin nila. But why? Financial benefits? Isusubo lang ang luho?

In fact, kaya maraming mga kabit not simply because they are secret whores, it’s because they want to sustain their LUHO! My friend said she didn’t watch Etiquette for Mistresses, but usually, looking at the trailer, kapag mayaman ang kinakabit na lalaki, siyempre sinong bang tatanggi, diba?

Kaya huwag kayong magtaka kung bakit hanggang ngayon, si Gretchen Barretto ay nananatiling kabit ni Tonyboy Cojuangco! It’s simply because, gusto niyang panatilihin ang luho niya!

Also, speaking of the mang-aagaw thing, I don’t think, Marian Rivera or Angelina Jolie were homewreckers. If they are, how come nagtagal si Brangelina before getting married? Also, how come Marian and Dingdong got married finally?

At ang lakas pa namang mag-advocate ng gender equality tsaka women empowerment, pero ang ini-idolo, mga mang-aagaw! Iyan ang mas malandi, tsaka hindi malayong maging kabit! It’s hypocritical for most Filipinos to slut-shame kabit, but aren’t they also being hypocritical for being so SILENT towards their idols who steal boyfriends? And in the case of the prudes, they tolerate this, for as long as their own children are not the ones doing the same thing.


Also, the prudes are using the libel card to silence people who are shaming LEGIT pussies. So, you still want this hulabaloo to continue!? Na maraming kabit, mang-aagaw ng dyowa… like seriously!? Condoning these acts of decadence is considered normalizing rape and pedophilia. Also, normalizing pangangabit tsaka extramarital affairs is like saying, “Okay lang maging pokpok, anak.” Granted, it’s not even bad to legalize prostitution, but to normalize such and to be accepted by society… is something dubious.

Lastly, the prudes are NO DIFFERENT from the Yellows and Red. If the latter two are shaming the likes of Mocha Uson, the prudes slut-shame people who had a sex scandal video circulating online, but at the same time, they keep silent to LEGIT pussies, such as homewreckers and man-stealers. Kaya wala kang karapatang isuklam si KrisTULO Aquino kapag idol na idol mo sina Majarot tsaka KubetAA. This is my same advice towards a person who is a leftist, pero wagas mag-advocate ng women empowerment. See the irony? At kapag nag-slutshame, tatawaging “misogynist,” “sexist,” o ‘di kaya, “fuck your macho culture!”

That’s why Filipino culture is pretty hypocritical. Hangga’t may mga prudistang mga nagbabalat-kayo, hindi uusad ng derecho ang Pinas.

Confession Box: Uphold the Freedom of Speech!

WHY DO I STILL OPPOSE CYBER-LIBEL, despite the fact that I was bullied and harassed online, esp. in Q&A social media?

1.) Cyber-libel suppresses freedom of expression.
2.) Policing freedom of speech is never cool.
3.) It allows butthurt elitists to silence their critics.
4.) We’re progressing backwards.
5.) It is UNCONSTITUTIONAL. Anyone who says otherwise is downright STUPID!

In addition, people will abuse cyber-libel for their vested interests. Jusko! Kung sino pa ang magaling mam-bully, sila pa ang pikon at the end of the day.

That’s why, if a bully is exposed on the internet, they will play the victim card. Ganyan sila ka-SUPÓT!

Lastly, it is a BUTTHURT law.

Confession Box: From someone’s teenage self…

Well, if you still do not know the person, I think your common sense should distinguish who that person is. HAHAHA.

Confession: My teenage self says, Maja Salvador is pretty much like Kate Hudson

1. A lot of people in my circle think they’re pretty and talented;
2. Well that’s because they made a name of their own from their acting dynasties

Well, I beg to differ. I don’t find both of them that attractive, or extra-ordinarily talented. Hmmm… somehow, simple-minded people find them excellent thespians.

Huh? They lack charisma, that’s why I don’t like them both.

I cannot help but cringe when they act. I’m not saying they’re talentless, of course they have talent. It would be a shame if they don’t have talent, since after all, they belong to an entertainment dynasty.

However, calling them extraordinarily talented in acting really insults my inner artist self. Well of course, I’m still struggling to improve my craft, and I’m only starting to study visual arts (on my own), I will have to admit that.

Calling them “magaling na artista” does not impress me at all. In fact, calling me “ampalaya” to ’em makes me want to say, “Well, screw you!” I cringe when Maja acts. If I cringe, it means, she’s not good enough to me. Also, I’ll crige if Hollywood romantic comedies are great. In fact, they’re the shittiest.

Side Note: Maja-rot still speaks in a cacophonic manner. Anong magaling dun? Sorry guys, if you think she’s good in acting, for me, she is still trying oh-so hard to be an excellent thespian. To be honest, I find Sandara Park “more talented,” to think she’s basically known for being charismatic. Also, if you really are excellent in acting, you have to deliver your lines, CONVINCING the audience. I never saw your beloved Ross doing it—given, her facial expressions speak otherwise.

To be honest, Sunshine Cruz is a better actress, and talent-wise, she is waaaaaaay more multi-talented.

Fuck to those who will denounce my opinion to them.

A lot of simple-minded people will think they’re “artistahin” enough in their book (looks and talent-wise).

My wise words? Stop pretending that they’re something they’re actually NOT!

In fact, pretending that they’re extra-ordinarily beautiful and excellent in acting at the same time makes me fucking cringe. I just want to ask these people, “ARE YOU SHITTING ON ME!?”

Kate Hudson? Well, how come she’s no longer relevant!? Given, she has a pleasing personality, but that’s about it. She may be coming from an acting dynasty, yet she didn’t give herself enough time to delve on her special capabilities. All she does is do chick flicks and romantic comedies, which is why I cannot afford to be a fan of hers.