Author Archives: pilosopongkomikado

About pilosopongkomikado

Ako si Komikado. Pilosopo. Gwapo. At saka galit ako sa mga elitistang social climber. 'Yun na!

Contring mentality is better than PWEDE NA ‘YAN mentality!


Tonton Contreras’s mentality is always better than those admins of Kapuso Warriors, and of course, the diehard Marcos supporters/loyalists. Here’s one thing: Contring (Tonton-sensei) has a much more self-actualized, pragmatic, and authentic form of liberalism than you could ever imagine. He is a DDS and pro-BBM supporter, yet he does not give in to the nonsensical hype called, “Tito Sotto and Manny Pacquiao deserve to become senators because they’re not Yellow!”

This is the worst insult to all thinking and intellectual humankind.

GRANTED, Sotto and Pacquiao are not yellow, still they’re fully qualified to be categorized in the “trapo’t balimbing” category. No wonder, the thinking Yellows and leftists KNOW BETTER than the pro-Marcos DDS who are mostly prude conservatives. Also, they should be careful what they wish for: Both Sotto and Pacquiao voted for Gina Lopez, who is obviously coming from an OLIGARCH family. Hate to break it to you, but she’s the FACE of regression due to the following reasons: 1.) She doesn’t realize that her enemies should be the mining oligarchy; 2.) yet she plays favoritism due to “utang na loob” syndrome.


She’s well-liked by the prude conservatives (of course, represented by Sotto and Pacman), and of course, the liberal elitists (of course, represented by the Yellows). So, if you’re pro-Marcos and a Kapuso Warriors admin, be careful what you wish for! The people you’re defending might qualify to be a “Trojan horse,” so to speak.

Contring is the true Thinking Pinoy, not TP

It is disgusting when RJ Nieto/ThinkingPinoy is pro-Sotto, while Raffy Gutierrez and Bb. Maharlika is pro-Pacquiao.

I do not know why, but I have my utmost respect to Contring-sensei when it comes to his logical skills. Why can’t he teach CRITICAL THINKING instead? After all, he makes people overthink (well, sometimes lol), and he challenges people to think OUTSIDE politics.

Why can’t we think critically like Tonton-sensei? Are we afraid to be called, “ANG GULO MO!”, or rather, “ANO BA TALAGA ATENG!? ANO BA TALAGA KUYANG!?”

It’s hard to be an iconoclast, yet his way of thinking is really damn good—self-actualized. ICONOCLAST, like how he proudly and fearlessly describes himself. STRAIGHT FROM THE HEART. NO-NONSENSE.

Thinking like him is more than something—that’s why he’s my fave DDS online personality, so to speak. Here are some reasons:

1.) He reconciles (though informally) Asian values with Western values – That’s why, he is lecturing Sass Rogando Sasot, regarding culture. While Sass preaches Western culture, sometimes it goes out-of-control because if you use titles, she thinks it’s already considered “SLAVE MENTALITY,” when insisting on Asian values doesn’t always mean, “Using titles means slave mentality.” It does not always work that way—honorifics are also important; but in the West, they find it useless, since it’s IN THEIR CULTURE to have an egalitarian society. Also, European languages aren’t really too keen on having Asian honorifics such as “-ssi/-san,” or even “Lao (insert name).” If you think it’s “useless” to have honorifics, THINK AGAIN.

Look at Japan—even though titles and honorifics are VERY IMPORTANT to them, at the end of the day, regardless of what social status you belong to, you basically eat the same food, and vice versa. Same with Korean culture.

In fact, East Asians are one of the most straightforward ethnicities you will ever encounter—they may not be “straightforward” by Western standards, but they DO speak their mind. Only that, they do it politely.

2.) He always tells us, like Nuseir Yassin of Nas Daily, “Never let politics get into your way of your friendship” – That is true. I may not agree with some people’s politics, but it’s okay, since we should basically NEVER talk about politics. However, there’s a need to talk about politics is for the country—can’t we simply fight back against the sh*t system that took away the dignity of Filipinos who had no choice but to become OFWs?

Call Contring-sensei “stupid” for going back to the Philippines after he finished his graduate studies in Hawaii, yet in my book, it was NEVER a stupid move. People like him are BADLY needed in a world of simple-minded/small-minded people who think like bobotantes—you know the halupagung jejolmang who watches teleseryes and eats pagpag for breakfast, lunch, and dinner; and cannot even hold a decent conversation, whether in English or in Tagalog—and yet, have the fucking nerve to complain about heavy traffic, when in fact they might be the same people buying and buying vehicles non-stop yet do not follow simple traffic rules.

No wonder, be an Antonio Contreras in world of simple-minded people.

3.) His liberalism is Eastern – Western-style liberalism tends to be ideal and quite elitist-ic, whereas Eastern-style liberalism is more authentic and pragmatic, making it more in-line with realism. Here, you don’t stick to what is ideal—but rather, balancing ideal and realist principles.

So here’s the thing:

  • Authenticity + Pragmatism = progression
  • Absence of these 2 = regression

Despite the fact that he has studied in Hawaii for his graduate education, he will always make sure, Eastern values should be in harmony with Western values. Insisting on just one doesn’t even make sense.

To understand Asian culture (Eastern Asian, to be exact), you need to have a holistic way of thinking—somehow, this explains why Asian languages have no concrete rules.

4.) To sum it up: It’s more fun to be complex than to be simplistic – Contring-sensei is pretty much hard to understand, unless you really do have a COMMON GROUND.

Also, he’s the one who has a good style of teaching—he does not limit himself to the classroom. He also teaches OUTSIDE the classroom, which is why you get to learn critical thinking in an unorthodox manner, FOR FREE. So, love him or hate him, he’s the only one who thinks like a true intellectual and a true supporter of the president. If you tend to be anti-Sotto and Pacquiao at the same time, chances are you won’t be a fan of US President Donald Trump and Russian leader Vladimir Putin—this holds true for many reasons: Conservatives tend to resist change; while liberals tend to embrace change slowly, and surely.

5.) If you want a rebuttal of Paul Joseph Watson’s tirades—better go for Contring-sensei – In fact, PJW’s logic is more on the prude-ish side, so people would rather call him a scumbag.

Conservatives tend to be more honest and stick to higher beauty standards, while liberals tend to have the “pwede na ‘yan” mentality when it comes to beauty standards. Here, I can say, the liberals tend to be pretentious sometimes, but in Contring’s case, he’s far from being that notion—he is fearlessly honest with his sentiments, and would tell us, even though Jover Laurio is obviously unattractive, we should never attack her for her looks.

He’s right. Only a liberal like him has the guys to say that making fun of your enemy’s appearance, even though it is not a necessity, isn’t something desirable. He would tell us, make a rebuttal but making fun of someone’s looks is ad hominem.

Also, liberals tend to return the favor when someone is spewing signs of intolerance—which the conservatives would tolerate, if the statement is agreeable with them. That’s why, speaking of homophobic taunts, Contring has the Filthy Frank mindset of saying, “JUST STOP! STOP IT, STOP, NO!”

Overall thoughts

I have a lot more to say, but that would be all for now. If you think, Contring has a vague mindset—think again.


Dear regressive right and left: You DO owe your successes to a corrupted system

In a system so corrupt, you didn’t even question the way it was managed by the oligarchy, and of course, the crocopigs feeding their ego.

You owe your successes to the corrupt system that nourished your careers so much, you even thought that corruption is a “way of life,” rather than an anomaly.

No wonder, you prude conservatives and liberal elitists are BOTH regressive.

PRUDES: You approved of cyberlibel no thanks to Tito Sotto’s thin-skinned behavior. You are anti-divorce, anti-FDI, and lastly, you won’t mind Manny Pacquiao to be the “first Christian president” of the Philippines.

LIBERAL ELITISTS: You believe, democracy is dead. De Lima getting jailed. Strongman Marcos buried at the Libingan ng mga Bayani. Lastly, CJ Meilou Sereno being ousted by her own colleagues.

Guess what?

You are fucking disgusting to the core.

You really do OWE your current successful achievements in your own entire careers to the corrupt system that nourished you. That’s why, even your minds, hearts, and souls have accepted corruption towards your system, making you one of the contributors of “Kaya Di Umuunlad Pilipinas” syndrome.

Wait until you experienced the plight of the Jews and Armenians in world history. Having a sense of entitlement, being inconsiderate, and thinking you own democracy like your personal property should be grounds for you to deserve being a true victim of genocide.

No one needs your fucking rotten mindset, anyway.

Dear Philippine Regressive Left: You can cry all you want

PHOTO CREDITS TO makingitfuninthephilippines.

However, let me make this clear: The Meilou Sereno ouster has to be done.

No amount of words can explain the fact that, disgraced Chief Justice Ma. Lourdes “Meilou” Sereno clearly VIOLATED THE LAW. Also, enough of this “death of democracy” bullcrap. The Rule of Law has been upheld.


What methinks about Billy Crawford and Coleen Garcia’s prenup shoot in Ethiopia

It would have been better if there was interaction between the couple and the locals. JUST TAKE A LOOK AT THIS:

And let’s face it: Dito lang magkakaroon ng opportunity maging SJW ang mga tao rito.

Well here’s why: Exoticizing an indigenous group reeks something not-so good. In fact, exoticizing them does not even empower them with a single bit.

AND IT HAS NOTHING TO DO WITH RACE: How will you feel kung ginawa ring PROPS ang mga katutubong Pilipino!? What if, ginawang props ang mga Lumad?

…and imagine this: Will you still take offense if “exotic-looking” people like Melai or Marlou will be props, and the setting is in a squatters’ aread???

If you think Billy and Coleen’s photoshoot is ethereal to the core, then you might be missing something.


My friend said:

Dito kasi nangangapa sina Maharlika tsaka Raffy Gutierrez: They both have this “bilib na bilib” feeling towards Manny Pacquiao.

Eh diba, parang you’re promoting the fact that “It’s ok to be a bobotante?”

Kapag ayaw kay Sen. Pacquiao, Dilawan tsaka elitista kaagad? Ako, openly pro-Duterte-Marcos ako, it’s only that, I tend to take responsibility when I vote for someone.

Ang responsableng pro-Marcos tsaka pro-Duterte, hindi iboboto ang mga kagaya ni Tito Sotto o ni Manny Pacquiao. Okay, I get it, you hate Tito Sotto… but if you tend to be pro-Pacquiao, it’s only saying that, “It’s ok to be bobotante.”

Remember, we stand firm in our ground: Voting for Sotto and Pacquiao at the same time, or either one of them, is considered BOBOTANTE. Ang mga bobotante pa naman, sila iyung mga bili ng bili ng kotse ngunit pasaway naman sa daan. At idagdag niyo pa, sila iyung mga taong may “works as a freelance model” at “e di sa puso mo,” or “The Krusty Krab.”

Kung bobo ka, bobo ka talaga!

This is a RANT to those who think that it’s OK for kids to be stupid, by saying that the planet next to Mercury is 7-11.

Call me killjoy of some sort, but this is unacceptable. Sure, this is funny to most of you, still the BBC commentary on North Korea when the two kids entered the dad’s room is much more hilarious.

The reason why I am RANTING BALLISTICALLY is because, if you are allowing your kids to be BOBO AF, then they’ll be the jejemong hitad who works at “The Krusty Krab,” o “e di sa puso mo,” as a “freelance model” kuno.

Now, these people on social media would most likely to be BOBOTANTE: They vote for Tito Sotto and Manny Pacquiao in the senate because, “Malaki ang binigay niyang karangalan sa bayan,” or other ad hominem reasons such as, “Sikat, eh!” Voting for these two goons is no different from voting for either Sonny Trillanes or even Grace Poe. Trust me, you don’t want to see me angry, right?

Being “bobo” doesn’t always mean, “Walang alam,” o “puro bagsak.” Being bobo actually means, lacking imagination at the first place. Ang kabobohan, it’s a life decision. Kung pipiliin mo talaga maging bobo, magiging bobo ka talaga. No wonder, you should no longer wonder why I consider G Toengi, Marlene Aguilar, Cheska Garcia, Ina Raymundo, and Andi Manzano as the “matalino league,” while at the same time, I look down on the likes of Donita Rose, Sunshine Cruz, or even Gretchen Barretto.

Being matalino is also improving your race. Call me racist, elitist, and anything you want, but I can NO LONGER afford to be a hypocrite. Calling Melai Cantiveros “attractive” as a monocultural Asian person IS a sign of hypocrisy. However, calling Song Hye-kyo, Kristine Hermosa, Marian Rivera, Heart Evangelista, or even Ellen Adarna “attractive” as a monocultural Asian person IS a sign of honesty.

Also, calling Natalia Poklonskaya, Sabina Altynbekova, and Katya Lischina attractive as the same person I have mentioned, IS considered a sign of honesty. Who won’t ever follow them on social media, right?

Lastly, if you’re going to call Yui Aragaki the “ideal girl” of the town, again, as the same person I’ve mentioned, IS a sign of honesty.

Being honest (without sugarcoating), having high standards, rich and expensive taste, and settling for MORE (or not settling AT ALL), IS a sign of intelligence. That’s why, be frank with accord to your standards. Kung prangka ka ng prangka’t si Marlou Arizala o si Manny Pacquiao naman ang mga idolo mo, will you still be tagged as credible? I don’t think so, esp. if you think that it’s ok to be brutally frank, even though your standards are painstakingly low, and your taste is also poor and cheap. It’s also being brutally frank and being a prude conservative, esp. when it comes to relationships, but would often idolize boyfriend-stealing celebrities like Maja-rot Salvador and Cristine “KubetAA” Reyes-Khatibi.

Wala kang karapatang maging prangka kapag hindi siya naa-ayon sa standards mo. Also, wala ka ring karapatang maging prangka kung ultimong idolo mo pa lang, lumalabag sa mga prinsipyo mo. Isn’t that a sign of hypocrisy, na it’s ok for boys to chase women, pero “cheap” kapag babae ang naghahabol, unless mang-aagaw siya ng dyowa?

In that case, Majarot and KubetAA needed a father figure like Tito Sotto. At least, hindi na sila mang-aagaw ng boyfriend kahit kailan, since they have a father figure who could already guide them how they should handle their relationships. Kung “misogynist” sa tingin niyo si Tito Sotto, well, at least someone has a good concern when it comes to raising their daughters. Tingnan niyo si Ciara Sotto, did you ever hear of her stealing boyfriends? Pwes, siya nga ang “inagawan,” kaya siguro bumalik siya sa poder ng mga magulang niya.

Also, enough of the “lumaki kasi ng walang tatay eh” excuse. Usually, those women who steal boyfriends are often fatherless, but it’s the mother’s responsibility to show a good example. No wonder, iyung nanay ni Selena Gomez na si Mandy Teefey, she deserves to be called “na-ano lang,” besides Miho Nishida. Iyung mga babaeng lumaki ng walang tatay ngunit pinalaki ng lolo o lola, sila pa ang walang problema sa pagkakaroon ng nobyo: It only means, those girls who grew up with their grandparents (usually those who have a heart, and are willing to raise them in behalf of their mothers) are often more well-behaved, and less likely to be stealing boyfriends.

Speaking of stealing boyfriends, it’s also a sign of KABOBOHAN. Also, kung papayag si boyfriend na agawin siya ni mang-aagaw, siya na talaga ang ulirang BOBO BOY, at si mang-aagaw ay certified GAGA GIRL (refer to DOH’s song on teen pregnancy). Facts don’t care about feelings, that’s why if you see a mang-aagaw girlfriend and “nagpa-agaw” boyfriend, they’re the ultimate INUTIL couple.

At ang mga BOBO pa naman, they breed like rabbits: They create a generation of MORONS who remain jejemon and have this “halupagu” mentality. They’re the same people who called Marlene Aguilar “baliw,” and at the same time glorifying Manny Pacquiao’s rather self-righteous yet contradictory statements. Lastly, sila dapat ang maging biktima ng genocide kung saan, sana sila na lang ang pinatay, imbis na iyung mga totoong biktima ng genocide pa ang pinatay.

No wonder, we need to stop this epidemic called, “KABOBOHAN.”

NOTE: This is a collab blog entry with MSPanythinginrandom.

Do boyfriend-stealing female celebrities need to have a reputedly “misogynist” father figure?

Heto lang naisip ko: Papano kung si Majarot tsaka si KubetAA eh naging ama si Tito Sotto?

Para sa amin, hindi na sila mang-aagaw kahit kailan ng dyowa. Remember, if you have a father figure in life, you’ll be compelled NOT to steal boyfriends.

Idolizing Majarot and KubetAA, while feeling sorry for what Pepsi Paloma has gone through is NOT an argument. Ayaw din namin kay Tito Sotto bilang mambabatas, ngunit isipin niyo nga ‘to: Si Ciara Sotto, nananatiling mabuting halimbawa sa mga madla kahit mabigat ang pinagdadaanan niya bilang madre de pamilya. It shows, Tito Sotto isn’t all that bad—he’s simply put: not a good solon, which bobotante people will never understand (take note ah, Tito only entered politics because of PURE nepotism).

Remember when he “shamed” a woman who displays her decadent lifestyle? Never forget the outrage of people, calling Tito a “misogynist.”

Well, fatherless women who steal boyfriends need to have a father figure like Tito Sotto. Isipin niyo kaya ‘to: Kung misogynist talaga si Tito Sotto, how come matatag parin ang kanyang relasyon sa asawa niyang si Helen Gamboa?

Side Note: And speaking of his statements towards Judy Taguiwalo, he should check his privilege!

To quote QueenRoxy:

Those who defended Tito Sotto clarified na parang tatay lang din na nanenermon iyan. They even added that the woman was also trying to save her ass kahit siya rin mismo ang may kasalanan why their marriage has been screwed up. Sometimes we need to give our fathers, husbands and boyfriends the credit why they are being uptight on us. Iisa lang din ang likaw ng bituka ng mga lalaki and alam ng lalaki ang animal instinct ng kapwa lalaki.

This is what I mean—MSP suggested the question of, “What if, si Majarot at KubetAA, si Tito Sotto ang naging father figure nila? It only means, hindi nila siguro afford mang-agaw ng dyowa.”

To be honest, I will agree. Minsan, nagiging “excuse” na ang hindi pagkakaroon ng “ina-ama” sa buhay para lang mang-agaw ng dyowa. Tingnan niyo kaya si Julia Montes? Pia Wurtzbach? I never ever heard of them stealing boyfriends, to think they were too distant from their fathers. Speaking of Majarot and KubetAA, I don’t think their being fatherless was an excuse for them to steal boyfriends—after all, if you idolize both of them, you don’t have the right to hate on Kris Aquino: Kris TOO LOW is another example of someone who not simply steals boyfriends—she’s a legit homewrecker for eff’s sake.

Also, stealing boyfriends isn’t only offensive to the original girlfriend, but also to men who also keep their pride intact. Kaya hinihiwalayan talaga ang mga mang-aagaw—look at Dennis Trillo, he may have been a jerk before, but he’s smart enough to deny that he and AA Klenk were together. Dennis Trillo may not be a good boyfriend, but he sees marriage as a lifetime COMMITMENT. It’s not because, marriage = lust. Mali iyun. If you want to be taken seriously, to quote Charlize Theron, she “treats her relationships like marriages.” No wonder, even though she is equally-flawed like the rest of the celebrities, at least she’s transparent and not pretending to be “untouchable.”

Mas hanga pa nga kami sa mga artistang ina-aming tao din sila’t, hindi dekadente ang pamumuhay nila.

Kaya naisip ko ‘to ay dahil, you see, if Majarot and KubetAA will have a father figure like Tito Sotto, at least nagagabayan sila kung papano mag-pursue in a relationship. Also, at least, if they have boyfriends, malamang they have a cue on how to make sure, the guy is single and available for dating.

Ang pang-aagaw kasi ng dyowa, you’re not only insulting the original girlfriend; maski sarili mo na rin (bilang babae) tsaka iyung lalaki ang binabastos mo. Usually, ang lalake ang papayag kung magpapa-agaw siya sa mang-aagaw (realtalk iyan! Itanong niyo lang sina Gegemon tsaka bRayver).

In fact, if you are a woman and you tolerate mang-aagaw female celebrities, and idolizing them while turning a blind eye to their decadentscapades, then fuck you! Also, sa mga lalakwe, look up to Majarot and KubetAA, then you’re becoming a Michael Sonmore. Sums up, MSP and I actually hate Selena Gomez because she’s becoming like the two mang-aagaw artista—idolize Selena, and you’re actually screwing up your relationship. In fact, Selena is Michael Sonmore in female form: If Sonmore allows his wife to f*ck other men in the name of “feminism,” Selena relies on friends’ exes, and makes them her “leftover” boyfriends, thus making herself a rebound. Ano iyun, kakain lang ng pagpag!? Huwag kami, oi!

Side Note: And take note ha, iyung sinabi ni Tito Sotto kay Ka Judy? He should tell it to Selena’s mom instead. I’m sure, mas making sense pa si Titosen. The way Selena was brought up sums up how she handles her relationships—the most credible source will be exposingSMG.

Remember, we’re not even moralist to say these things. Kung ayaw namin kay Titosen bilang mambabatas, pagdating naman siguro sa pagiging padre de pamilya, mas hahangaan pa namin siya, kahit papano. After all, speaking of the “urban legend” that is about the “rape” thing is actually fake. Kung totoo talagang nangyari iyun, malamang hinatulan sila kaagad ng parusang kamatayan.